No subject
Mon Jun 25 13:53:28 EDT 2007
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
source code, which must
be distributed under the terms of Sections
1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
customarily used for software interchange; or,
c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
received the program in object code or executable form with such
an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it. For an
executable work, complete source
code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a
special exception, the source code distributed need not include
anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
itself accompanies the executable.
If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering
access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent
access to copy the source code from the same place counts as
distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not
compelled to copy the source along with the object code.
> Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> If you study the pictures on the Valemount site closely, those aren't
>> Avilia boards. The WAR2-G2 is, but the other two are not, they look
>> like ADI "Pronghorns".
>
> Ah, mystery explained thanks.
>
>> Not sure why you'ld spend the money, and, if memory serves, they're
>> BE, while most of the rest of the *nix world on xscale is LE.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> (valemount rips off GPL code too.)
>
> Yeah, if they published the source I'd buy their stuff, but OpenWRT on
> gateworks
> boards looks like a better option for me.
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
------=_NextPart_000_061A_01C7915B.9814CD20--
More information about the Avila
mailing list